Family watchdog, tracking sex offenders, and murder

BoingBoing has an entry pointing to Family Watchdog. Family Watchdog is a mapping service that shows the home addresses of convicted sex offenders in the US, with their mug shot, and the nature of their crime. Part of me says “bravo! Parents have the right to protect their kids!”, but another part of me is deeply creeped out.

As far as I can tell, the justification for publishing this information is that sex offenders are very likely to reoffend, and vulnerable groups (namely kids) must be protected. Okay, I can handle that. But this kind of listing seems like it would have a whole raft of unintended consequences:

  • Mistaken identity leads to haressment of innocent people. This has already happened in at least one case in the US, where a woman put a sign on her neighbour’s lawn stating that he was a sex offender, except she’d screwed the address, and got the wrong guy. Oops.
  • Vigilantism. The BBC has reported a story about a man who the police believe was murdered because he looked similar to an offender on a registry. Oops.
  • Dangerous people shouldn’t be set free. If the legal system thinks that these people are dangerous enough to reoffend, they shouldn’t be put in a position where they can reoffend. They either shouldn’t be allowed back into mainstream society, or they should be monitored in such a way that prevents them from reoffending.
  • Compounding false convictions. If someone is falsely convicted of a crime, then this system will only compound the crap they have to go through. Canada has a proud history of false convictions. The US has a history of incarcerating large portions of its ethnic minorities. Is our legal system trustworthy enough to put potentially innocent people at risk of murder?
  • A false sense of security. Most sex offenders are known to their victims (90%, according to Family Watchdog). We shouldn’t be teaching kids to look at strangers with fear, when it’s much more likely that kids will be attacked by a family member, or someone in a position of authority.

These lists seem to be an indication that something has failed in the legal system. One of the roles of our legal system is to ensure that dangerous people shouldn’t be out in society. The symptom of this failure is that innocent people get smeared or hurt.

Fun fact: Family Watchdog is hungry for money, so hungry in fact, that they limit the information available to nonsubscribers. They also state that their website costs $4 million annually to run. They clearly care about your family so much that they are running their own small nuclear power plant to keep the site up in case of power failure. And don’t forget to check out their great store for all the cool fear-inspired merchendise.

Ugh. Maybe when I have kids, I’ll think these registries are a good idea. Who knows?

10 Responses to “Family watchdog, tracking sex offenders, and murder”

  1. 2006.May.22 @ 19:28

    Are you nuts?? Do you know how many kids are molested each year, and how many this can save. And you’re bitching about the possibility of a few adults being wrongfuly harassed? do you have any clue what it feels like to be molested? Obviously not, it affects you’re whole life, and these kids are never the same. Even if they are hungry for money as you say, the amount of children that can be possibly kept away from these cretins is worth any amount. Our children are targets for these evil people and unless you are doing something to stop this yourself you really shouldn’t be writing this crap.

  • Pingback from Pie Palace » More about public lists of convicted sex offenders
  • 2006.Jun.29 @ 12:00

    I’m not too sure about the real effectiveness of these registries. It seems to me it is causing a lot of harm, and taking the rights away from individuals, who have done wrong, granted, but are still human beings. Not long ago there was a teenaged boy who stalked offenders that had been listed on one of these internet registries, taking the bus on a murder tour from Canada into the States.And the really sad part is that one of his victims was a man convicted of statutory rape for sleeping with his 17 year old girlfriend after he turned 18…he sounded like a real threat to society, right?
    Not only did this ruin the lives of the targeted offenders, and their families, but I can imagine that the boy’s family and friends are still trying to come to terms with his vigilante actions and subsequent suicide. All this seems to accomplish is to encourage the public to take justice into their own hands, when the average citizen is not qualified to pass judgement or dole out punishment. That’s why we invented a justice system.
    And the system is aware of these offenders and their activities, and are monitored and must pass evaluations and long probations upon release. While the system needs improving, it is still our second best defense against pedophiles. The first? Proper parenting and supervision…no pedophile will snatch a child who’s holding their parent’s hand, and with proper instruction, children can be taught to take appropriate actions when approached by strangers. Take away the opportunity, and it doesn’t matter where the threat is, they won’t have a chance to act on their impulses.

  • 2007.Oct.06 @ 01:24

    My poor mentally ill son was falsely accused by a child from an extremely dysfunctional family over ten years ago and his life will be terrible forever. He is presently in prison for being one day late in registering a change of address. He was out on parole for two months (from a 3 yr. sentence) but went to a snowball stand and was recognized and put back in prison. There was an excellent article in the Baltimore City Paper in August, 2007 called “The Boogieman of Roland Park” but this was after a weeklong media blitz that portrayed his case in the most sensational, black and white manner. The child who accused him lived with 3 criminal uncles (one a convicted pedaphile) and a mother and older sister who were prostitutes and crack addicts (both dead now). She has been in and out of prison for drugs and prostitution and assault. But I do not hate her. Her life has been and is a hell. There are children who pick “safe” people to accuse instead of unsafe ones and I think that this may have happened in my son’s case. Also the police may have “coached” her, we’ve learned. The states attorney, I was told, acted like he hated my son and thought he looked “wierd” and my son’s attorney was so bad. I feel great guilt because I let my son take an Alford Plea. The lawyer gave us 15 minutes to make this life-changing decision. He never told us it was a felony (even though I asked him that question). He never told us about the need to register and he also never even said it would be seen as admitting guilt in the eyes of the law and community. My son never had more than a traffic ticket on his record and he was 36 yrs. old at the time this happened. He was (because of his illness) naive and trusted people too easily. When I asked his lawyer if it didn’t matter if someone was innocent, he shrugged. I wish people who think this issue is an all or nothing one would consider that sometimes children do lie and I can assure you, this is one lie that once you are accused, it will ruin your life forever. I have been a therapist for over twenty years and four of them were working in child abuse work. I saw cases of children being deceitful, most often teens but still, things are not always what they seem. If you saw my son when this happend and saw this child, you would not want to go to court for fear that appearances would rule and that the child could lie well. Now I’ve learned a great deal about her and know she would not have lied well. But when you don’t know and you have a lawyer like my son had, you feel you have no choice.

  • 2009.Sep.03 @ 16:34

    Sad. I am sad for you and your family. I do know that the dialogue creates awareness and that is worth more than can be imagined. Years ago my mother was told by a member of my fathers family not to leave my older sister(than a small child) in the same room as an uncle of my fathers. Shocked, she asked why. She was told that he was ‘that way’, but no one talked about it. The dont tell and certainly dont ask mentality no longer is welcome in our society. No longer can these things go unnoticed and by talking we create openings for honesty from victims. Teach to tell the truth and respect that sometimes the unbelievable is true. even when we do not want to believe it.

  • 2009.Oct.31 @ 00:17

    Tina do you know what it’s like to be killed for looking like someone else? Yea nor do I but it’s probably a whole lot worse than getting mollested? It’s called therapy.. And I’m sure people have lost there jobs for these reasons to and are humiliated in front of there entire family and there friends, so basically I agree with whoever posted this, cuz I know I sure as hell ain’t getting shot up for looking like some rapist / child molester.

  • 2009.Nov.21 @ 22:58

    My name is Mischellene Ball – formerly Mischellene Stratton in Alberta, Canada. Here in Canada and as far as I can tell, sex offenders and pedophiles are a pretty protected species. My ex-husband snuck into my daughter’s room and molested her for an hour and a half. She was completely traumatized and now will have to forever remember that he was her first sexual experience. How horrible is that for her! Anyway, I am sick to death of these sick, twisted bastards having their identities protected so they can walk around freely and even get together with single moms for the purpose of molesting their kids. This man raised my daughter with me since she was 5 years old and she had always called him Daddy. My ex didn’t even have his crime published in the paper like other criminals who commit crimes. He got to remain anonymous and then on top of it got no jail time for his conviction. All he got was 3 mths house arrest, probation, and 20 years on the sex offender list that nobody ever sees. He is completely messed up (goes after young teens online, is suicidal, habitual liar, mood swings, self-hatred and is narcissistic at the same time. He also has violent dreams and is obsessed with sex). So this guy gets to walk around looking for young kids and nobody can know who he is. Oh and last I heard is that his family wants to help him get unsupervised visits to my youngest daughter when his probation is through!!! We need to stop worrying about protecting these guys and start doing what we can to help parents protect their children. Getting mistaken for molestors doesn’t just happen because of organizations like Family Watchdog. People get mistaken for criminals from pictures in newspapers, television, posters, and even in police line-ups. Misunderstandings of this nature are simply human error and happen all the time and a zillion different ways. A sex offender registry would be a tool to help people protect their kids. A registry like this could also be limited to the use of victims of crimes and a separate page for the public with only most dangerous offenders listed. Something has to be done though.

  • Reply

    You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    If your website is claim enabled, it will be notified that you have posted here.