Crossing Party Lines

Okay, I’ve promised myself that I’m going to work on my thesis, and that I’m not going to dip into Green Party politics any more than absolutely necessary. Some kind soul decided that I need to know that Catherine Johannson worked at a Liberal Party event during the last Manitoba election. According to my tipster, her hubby is Shane Sadorski. According to Google, Shane is an employee of the Manitoba Liberals.

I’m not sure if I agree with Catherine Johannson’s position on Green issues (her blog is pretty sparse in terms of policy). All I know about her is that she has been endorsed by someone who comes across as a wee bit scary.

But the allegation of being involved in another party? Who cares? She was working at an event, probably to help her husband. Whenever I get a chance to go to another party’s event, I do. Partly for the free food, and partly to see how they do things. Unless something a little more damning comes up, this isn’t something that I really care about in terms of voting. I’m much more likely not to vote for her because of the endorsement I mentioned above.

From this moment on: No more Green Party stuff until my thesis is done. Period.

25 Responses to “Crossing Party Lines”

  1. 2006.Jul.10 @ 13:52

    I’m not bothered by people crossing party lines either. I’m actually leaning towards one particular former Liberal who’s running for a council position.

    If the Greens are to grow to have enough momentum to elect people to parliament, we’re going to have to welcome emigres from ALL other parties with open arms – lest we return to fringe party status.

  • 2006.Jul.10 @ 14:04

    Yup, I thought that endorsement was a tad scary, too.

  • 2006.Jul.10 @ 16:35

    Catherine didn’t work for the Liberals. It was a Christmas party she attended with her husband.

    I didn’t find anything scary in Gareth’s post. Could someone elaborate?

  • 2006.Jul.11 @ 21:49

    Hi Mark/SS,

    I thought Gareth came across a little strong. Language like:

    The Hub hates revenue sharing… What has unfolded since has been nothing short a selfserving distortion of the will of the party… staff and bunkerbuddies… usual crew of council asskissers

    One of the things that attracts me to the Green Party is that we aren’t wedded to any particular ideology. We are pragmatic. We are able to see the perspectives of others, and find solutions that meet common needs. That post doesn’t say anything about meeting common needs. That post doesn’t say anything about solidarity, other than “if we do things my way, there will be solidarity”.

  • 2006.Jul.12 @ 00:26

    I disagree with Gareth White – political power is a worthy goal. If we want to work to save the environment and stop global warming, then only political power can help.

    That does not mean abandoning or diluting principles. You can have your cake, AND eat it, too.

  • 2006.Jul.12 @ 14:50

    No, I did not work at a Liberal Party event. I attended the Manitoba Legislature’s Annual Holiday Open House, and dropped by the office of beloved Manitoba politician and well-respected environmentalist, Dr. Jon Gerrard. I did help hand out some hot chocolate to some kids and Jon was sweet enough to thank me in his blog.

    more here

    If you don’t want to vote for me because Gareth is voting for me, that’s certainly your right. I didn’t know that Gareth held so much influence in the party, but, if so, such is politics.

    For the record, my nominators are Mike Nickerson, Roger Benham, Erich Jacoby-Hawkins, Pauline Richards, Victor Lau and Zev Rumstein, so if anyone out there has a problem with any of these people, feel free to also take that into consideration.

    If you would like to know my position on Green issues: please ask! I have been happily responding to emails and phone calls on a number of subjects.

    If you are really interested in more info about me, feel free to check out my survey response at Frank Cameron’s list of council candidates.

  • 2006.Jul.12 @ 14:54

    Oops- I forgot that Michael Marshall, architect of the first Green Party of Nova Scotia full slate also nominated me and said some nice things about me:

    I would be honored to add my name to those GPC members who are nominating Catharine Johannson for the vacant position of GPC Council Chairperson – I saw her good work at the 2004 convention and followed her stalwart service on the GPC Council ever since – she’s no quitter and she stays the course.

  • 2006.Jul.12 @ 15:45

    Hi catharine,

    Thanks for stopping by to clarify the original allegation, and for posting a link to that list of questions. Gareth’s post certainly won’t get you my vote, it isn’t too likely to cost you my vote either.

    Good luck!

    e

  • Pingback from Pie Palace · The other election
  • 2006.Sep.07 @ 08:58

    Just “dropping by” the Manitoba Legislature’s Annual Holiday Open House? We don’t think so:

    http://www.manitobaliberals.ca/uploaded_images/Io91-705447.jpg

    http://www.manitobaliberals.ca/2005/12/holiday-reception.html

  • 2006.Sep.07 @ 10:37

    Nematode, Catharine did say she dropped by and then helped hand out hot chocolate to the kids (and probably mingled a bit). I don’t think she deserves to be condemned for any of that or for the fact that she posed for a picture with her husband and his boss.

  • 2006.Oct.03 @ 18:34

    Looks like most GPC members disagreed with darrell’s opinion ‘cuz she came third and lost. The members’ vote IS the bottom line.

  • 2006.Oct.04 @ 10:27

    Nematode,
    Although I’d like to question your leap in logic (such as coming to the conclusion that she came in third solely based on the Liberal party get together she was seen at) I’d rather like to know if you have some personal gripe with Catherine? Because to be honest, you’re coming across as someone looking to smear her and revel in her loss.

    And by the way, the members’ vote is not the “bottom line” for me.

  • 2006.Oct.04 @ 19:33

    Wow. All this traffic on a three month old topic. I’m glad that even my old entries are this interesting. =)

    I tend to agree with Mr. D. There’s no harm in appearing in a photo with the spouse’s boss.

  • 2006.Oct.23 @ 12:54

    Johannson’s and Gerrard’s versions are different. Only one can be true. I wonder which one it is . . . .

  • 2006.Oct.25 @ 10:28

    How are they different? Gerrard said she stopped by, stood for some photos, and helped out. Johannson said she stopped by, stood for some photos and helped out (by handing out hot chocolate to some kids).

    Seriously, this is a dead issue that you seem to keep bringing up and I don’t understand why.

  • 2006.Nov.14 @ 18:34

    Where does it say she just dropped by? It doesn’t say that anywhere.

    Catherine Johannson must have known that she was posing for a Liberal PR photo. It’s pretty obvious to any reasonable person.

  • 2006.Nov.16 @ 23:45

    Actually Nematode, it says she dropped by further up this conversation.

    Why is being seen in a photo with a Liberal such a bad thing?

    You seem very worked up over a little hot chocolate and a photo. And as far as truth goes, everyone has there own. Catherine says she dropped by, he link you sent said she “joined us”, the kids say “we got free hot chocolate.”

    Do you actually have a real problem with Catherine or just don’t like the idea of her handing out hot chocolate?

  • 2006.Dec.15 @ 15:53

    I wonder if she’s working the Liberals’ party again this year? I hear it’s a federal and provincial Liberal affair. Maybe she’ll buy a Liberal membership. She seems to like Liberals named “Gerrard.”

  • 2008.May.15 @ 09:36

    In 2007 Catharine Johannson contributed $828.75 to the Liberal Party of Manitoba according to that party’s 2007 annual financial statement posted on Election Maniotba’s web site at http://www.elections.mb.ca/main/political/finance/annual_returns/PDFs/PartyAnnualReturns/2007/F920_YE2007_Lib.pdf (go to page 11of the PDF).

    Some of you people quoted above will say that she just happened to stop by to write the cheque and it doesn’t really mean that she contributed money to the Liberals.

    For the non-Manitobans out there, we had a general election in 2007 in which the Green Party and Liberal Party’s ran against each other in 15 ridings.

    Markus Buchart

  • 2008.May.16 @ 13:57

    I see a typo in my post no. 20 above. Please change “Liberal Party’s” to “Liberal Party”. You needn’t post this message .

    Thank you,

    Markus Buchart

  • 2010.Aug.05 @ 09:35

    Dear Erigami,

    None of you responded.

    Don’t you agree that Catharine Johannson’s contributing $828.75 to the Liberal Party, especially during a general election year, constitutes supporting the Liberal Party against the Green Party?

    Thanks for the nice respectful emoticons. They’re so much easier than responding to facts, aren’t they?

    Thank you,

    Markus Buchart

  • 2010.Aug.05 @ 12:44

    Dear Erigami,

    I was writing for posterity, not the past.

    Funny how your computer never automatically generates happy emoticons for my posts.

    Happy fourth anniversary to you, too.

    Markus Buchart

  • Reply

    You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    If your website is claim enabled, it will be notified that you have posted here.