And the winner is…

This is a canned post, written on 2006/08/24.

So, by now, the Green Party should have announced who its new leader is. Since I’m writing this two days before the ballot count, I have absolutely no idea who has won [Editor's note: Elizabeth May won]. But that won’t stop me from offering an opinion.

Any regular readers of this blog will know that I’m rooting for David. If he has won, I would say something like:

I’m very, very happy that the Green Party membership has chosen David Chernushenko to be our new leader. He has done great work for the party in the past, and has done a lot to attract new members to the party. Much of our support in Ottawa-Centre is due to his work as candidate. This win shows that the Green Party is about more than “just” the environment, and our membership wants to broaden our base of support. With David at the head, I think we’re getting closer to winning seats.

Elizabeth May and Jim Fannon have both done a great job as candidates. I hope they continue their commitment to the party, and that Elizabeth is offered (and accepts) a Deputy Leadership position. I believe she holds great promise

Of course, I can’t predict the future, so who knows, maybe Elizabeth will win. If she does, I would say something like:

Congratulations to Elizabeth on her victory. She has shown a strong commitment to the environmental movement in the past, and has been involved in various social justice agencies. I am sure that she will be able to translate her success in those venues into a broader success, attracting the support of Canadians who don’t think of themselves as environmentalists. I hope that her network of supporters in the Sierra Club decide to get involved in the Green Party, and are able to open their vision to sustainability in all aspects of society.

David ran an excellent campaign. He was an underdog as soon as Elizabeth decided that she would enter; but his vision has value. I don’t think that a vote for Elizabeth equalled a vote against a Green Party with broader policies, that is able to attract a majority of Canadians to our fold. I hope that David stays in the public eye, and is offered a Deputy Leadership position

I do think that Elizabeth can make a good leader. I think that she sees that we need to move beyond “I’m right, and we have to do what’s right” justifications for our policy into a more open, yet still principled mindset.

I haven’t given Jim Fannon a lot of attention during this race, because I’m biased against his unilingualism. But I only have one vote, so it’s quite possible that he could have won. In which case, my response will be:

Congratulations to Jim Fannon on his victory. He speaks very well, and is entertaining in his delivery. With the appropriate language training, I’m sure he will be able to show that the Green Party has strong ideas.

Regardless of who our new leader is, I think the Green Party will come out ahead. Jim Harris, the Party leader between 2000 and 2006, did a good job at building the party. Now that we have the support that we need, it’s time for a new. One who can attract new votes; show that we’re a party with a broad vision; and let Canadians know that sustainability doesn’t have to hurt.

6 Responses to “And the winner is…”

  1. 2006.Aug.28 @ 17:15

    I’m curious if David is Deputy Leader at all. If ever two heads were better than one, it’s now.

    I do think she’ll win her C.B. seat – bold and risky move on her part, and could really pay off huge.

  • 2006.Aug.29 @ 11:27

    Conversely, if David is NOT made deputy leader, that sends out the message that the “right” side of the Green Party is not respected. I’m having a very tough time with the fact that Elizabeth May got almost 2/3 of the vote. Are we now a protest party?

  • 2006.Aug.30 @ 11:12

    I sort of like the Cape Breton seat idea. She can then say that she is running in the area she is from and not just dropping in where there is the most support. I don’t know if she can take the riding though.

    As for the Greens being a “protest party”? God, I hope not. I really hope that people believe that May has the best chance of getting elected and that she can focus on the big picture and not just be seen as an eviormentalist that happens to be running for parliment.

  • Pingback from Pie Palace · I’m back
  • 2006.Sep.07 @ 11:24

    Elizabeth won with 2/3 of the vote? Wow. I have to admit that is a little disappointing, but hey, that’s democracy for you.

    I certainly like how she’s started her leadership with her whistlestop tour. We need more gimmicky stuff like that to get ourselves into the media eye. And I like her last paragraph in one of her more recent blog posts:

    Please give us and each other the benefit of the doubt. We need to nurture and support each other. Never assume the worst of someone. In communication (especially on email) take the time to consider : “could I have mis-read this message?” Ask for clarification. Seek common ground. Don’t attack.

  • 2006.Sep.16 @ 14:38

    Brian C says ” if David is NOT made deputy leader, that sends out the message that the right” side of the Green Party is not respected”. What nonsense.

    Chernushenko is not the representative of any conservative wing of the GPC nor any market-methods focused policy group. Chernushenko actually permanently alienated all the people who advocated such methods and who put the 2004 platform together, by writing his “loyalty oath” during the 2005-6 election.

    Unless by “right wing” you mean “in favour of no internal process except for the leader’s personal whims”, i.e. Nazi-style “fuehrerprinzip”, there’s no legitimacy to the argument that Chernushenko represents any “right wing”.
    What evidence is there that he stands for any market style of policy or method? The person who stood for that most consistently in the GPC was probably Michael Pilling, and you see what the GPC bunker did to him. With Chernushenko’s full support.

    When you see Chernushenko publicly disavowing Wayne Crookes, you may see him back in the good graces of the party. But there’s a difference between favouring market methods of adapting to ecological realities, and putting your party up for purchase to the highest bidder. Don’t you agree?

    Chernushenko has a LOT to learn about politics: you don’t get to ignore people for being rude to you. Most of your opponents are rude to you most of the time. If you can’t listen through that and hear the facts, you don’t belong in politics at all.

  • Reply

    You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    If your website is claim enabled, it will be notified that you have posted here.