Paris

Ottawa is a world-class city and deserves a transit system worthy of that status – together we’re getting it right.

For some reason, Mayor Larry likes to keep saying Ottawa is a “world-class” city. Then again, he also liked to say that “zero means zero” (or is that 4.9?).

img_0730.JPGI suspect it will be a few more generations, a few city-wide fires, and a revolution or two until Ottawa becomes a world-class city to rival Paris. We don’t have the boulevards, landmarks, or public transit system to rival the French capitol.

About the only place we can hope to compete is with our on-street food vendors. We have two advantages: our culture accepts eating while walking and we have a large francophone population. It’s only a matter of time before some bright lad or lass at Algonquin discovers that crepes can be made and sold on the street.

“Oh! But what about beaver tails?” you say. The answer to that is simple: savory crepes. Do beaver tails have ham, tomato, feta? No. What about cheese? No. Beaver tails are a culinary dead-end. Crepes are like prokaryotes. There isn’t a gastronomic niche crepes can’t handle. Bring on a Canadian school of crepes, I say.

Sure, our city is a sprawling mess. Sure, our future transit plans are pretty much what we have now (with a little more tunnel). Sure, our city has few landmarks almost no public art. Sure, we don’t have much in the way of urban parks. But we can at least have some decent street food, dammit!

img_0735.JPG

2 Responses to “Paris”

  1. 2008.Apr.17 @ 18:26

    Ottawa might not have the landmarks, streets, or landmarks to rival Paris, but it also doesn’t have 12 million people or a history of taxing the rest of the country to benefit itself.

    When I lived in Ottawa I would often walk my dog through the park across the street, down a few blocks to a larger park, and if it was nice out, I would walk to the park by the river, and sometimes out to Lemieux Island where there’s a specific park for dogs.

    I’ve lived in 5 cites, and none of them have better public transportation, landmarks, or urban parks. Maybe Ottawa can’t compare with cities like Paris in those things, but I wonder how New York or Paris compares to Ottawa in terms of crime, traffic, or public schools.

  • 2008.Apr.19 @ 17:01

    @Adam: Ottawa certainly has its perks. If you live close to the major transit routes and you’re going somewhere on the same route, public transit will work for you. If you want to go somewhere in the ‘burbs, you’re out of luck.

    As to landmarks, I’m curious which landmarks you’re talking about. I can think of three: the cenotaph on the north end of Elgin, the National Art Gallery, and the Parliament. If you’re feeling charitable, you could start including museums, and maybe the peacekeeping memorial (although the only time I’ve ever heard someone mention the peacekeeping memorial was when it was spraypainted a few weeks back). Do we have any public squares? No. Do we have any showcase public sculptures? Just the cenotaph. Any boulevards? No.

    As to crime rates: I don’t see what that has to do with an attractive city, but here goes. In 2006 New York had 637.9 violent crimes, and 1,879.2 property crimes (all numbers per hundred thousand people). In Ottawa, the rate for 2006 was 580.3 violent crimes and 3,074.9 (again, per hundred thousand people). Assuming property crimes are roughly equivalent in the US and Canada, Ottawa has twice the rate of property crimes as New York, and almost as many violent crimes.

    I couldn’t find any stats on the Parisian crime rate or school availability in Ottawa, Paris, or New York.

  • Reply

    You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    If your website is claim enabled, it will be notified that you have posted here.