Green Party shut out. Again.

I really shouldn’t be surprised:

From: Gallery-Tribune [mailto:xxx@parl.gc.ca]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:48 PM
Subject: News Release – 2008 Leaders’ Debates / Communiqué de presse – Débats des chefs
[...]
News Release – 2008 Leaders’ Debates
OTTAWA, Sept. 8- Canada’s leading broadcasting networks today announced plans for the Leaders’ Debates during the general election campaign.
[...]
The Green Party:

The Consortium approached the parties to explore the possibility of including the Green Party in all or part of the Leaders’ Debates. However, three parties opposed its inclusion and it became clear that if the Green Party were included, there would be no Leaders’ Debates. In the interest of Canadians, the Consortium has determined that it is better to broadcast the debates with the four major party leaders, rather than not at all.
[...]
Jason MacDonald
Spokesperson for the Network Consortium
T (416) 482-1357
C (647) 205-4744
macdonald@veritascanada.com

The Green Party isn’t being included in the debates because three of the four establishment parties don’t want the Greens there. I’m surprised that they cared enough to threaten to pull out.
(Update: Edited for style)

3 Responses to “Green Party shut out. Again.”

  1. 2008.Sep.09 @ 14:07

    That seems weird to me, that the “established” parties end up having the final word as to whether the Green Party was included. Could the Liberals, NDP, and Bloc threaten to pull out unless the Conservatives were left out? I know, that would just be silly.

    I also find it odd that they threatened to pull out, especially if they didn’t know that the other two parties would also threaten it.

  • 2008.Sep.09 @ 16:41

    I suspect that our friends in the Consortium didn’t try too hard to get the Greens in. Their reasons for excluding us in the past have been pretty weak.

  • 2008.Sep.10 @ 07:27

    Yet another Hail Mary pass from Elizabeth May. Like running against Peter MacKay. Low probability attacks agains high value targets.

    Nice try, audacious, but not apparent setup for it either on a PR or a logistics basis. Done correctly, this would have been framed ahead of time so they could not get away with excluding her.

    From what I’ve seen this is symptomatic of her leadership, she’s long on the long shots short on the national machine building that makes a political party successful. And you really can’t do it alone, no matter how energetic you are.

    She’s the wrong person to lead the Greens at this phase of development, would have done much better if there was a stronger machine already in place.

    I must say I’m very disappointed with the Greens performance in the last cycle overall, very little exposure and the Liberals have totally eaten their lunch on the Environmental policy level.

  • Reply

    You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    If your website is claim enabled, it will be notified that you have posted here.