Gawp on OPL vs. GJ Hagenaars

PiePalace reader Gawp offered a fantastic comment on my post about GJ Hagenaarsassertion that the city should have exactly one staffer in every library branch. He starts out: “I know, lets use Mr. Hagenaars’ argument for other city services. They make just as much sense!”

what we truly need are small, local SNOW REMOVAL, with one SNOW REMOVAL PERSON (making less than six figures) and volunteer staff from the community to keep SNOW REMOVAL going. Let people vote with their SHOVELS if they want SNOW REMOVAL. If there are no volunteers (i.e. not enough interest), one SNOW REMOVAL PERSON is already too much.

Not to keep harping on Mr. Hagenaars, but I thought that was funny.

12 Responses to “Gawp on OPL vs. GJ Hagenaars”

  1. 2010.Jul.22 @ 10:50

    Gawp++

  • 2010.Jul.22 @ 12:38

    Clearly, you and your readers are missing the point.

    But as long as your enjoying yourself, this blog isn’t serious anyways.

  • 2010.Jul.23 @ 10:24

    Funny comment yes but it does miss the whole point of what GJ is trying to say. It’s not that the only possible solution is one person per library but we could look at it. We could look at many different ways to improve our libraries but the key point is to go through the exercise of reviewing what we need from our libraries and how do we deliver that service.

  • 2010.Jul.23 @ 11:45

    @Blake, no, it’s exactly on point what GJ is saying. Maybe he meant something else, but when you propose a specific (and rather silly) solution to a problem, it’s going to be taken at face value. Or at least it will until humans evolve long-distance telepathy to read the minds of our political candidates and determine what they /really/ meant.

  • 2010.Jul.24 @ 23:09

    @Anna: What’s the point of making comments without at least trying to explain the point. Oh well, as long as you’re enjoying yourself. Obviously wasn’t a serious comment anyways.

    @Blake He is not saying we should look for other ways to do thing. He has very specific ideas about what should be done. And a lot of them come across as not having a clue as to how the world really works. The library was just the most obvious one that stands out, but it’s right there with the park maintenance. Who would provide the equipment to mow the soccer fields. Who’s insurance pays up when someone who isn’t a city employee slips and hurts themselves maintaining a city park rink.

    And don’t get me started on his idea to delay the completion of the bus maintenance building. I’d love to be the one who delivers the law suit from the construction company who has the construction contract.

    Mr. Hagenaars obviously needs to have someone flush out his ideas before he starts sending them off to be published by the papers.

    Instead of voting with my volunteer time, I think I’ll continue to vote with… well my vote. Sadly I’m in College ward not Bay.

  • Pingback from My Fixation – Pie Palace
  • 2010.Jul.26 @ 07:44

    The point as I see it, is that first of all, communities should be involved in the services they wish to receive. Volunteerism is one of the best ways to improve services by making sure that those who use them have an invested stake in the success of the institution.

    It might depend on the community, but it would be nice to see people get involved again, and from what I’ve been reading on Mr. Hagenaars blog, that is his main point on this and other issues.

    Having paid staff is required, but to make more than $100,000 is too much. That’s how I read the comments.

    Thankfully, I do live in Bay Ward and will make myself a pleasure of voting for GJ Hagenaars, for you.

    Anna

    PS – At least Hagenaars has some ideas, I have yet to read anything concrete from the other Bay Ward candidates.

  • Reply

    You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    If your website is claim enabled, it will be notified that you have posted here.